Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most recent post
My Ode to Yolo Bypass
Gave my 1st ever talk about Yolo Bypass and my 1st ever talk about Nature Photography. Here it is ...
-
See Isolation and sequence-based characterization of a koala symbiont: Lonepinella koalarum Paper based on PhD thesis work of Katie Dahlha...
-
Just got this press release by email. I am sick of receiving dozens of unsolicited press releases, especially those in topics not related ...
-
I have a new friend in Google Scholar Updates I have written about the Updates system before and if you want more information please see...
In one way, the physicists were way ahead of biologists in terms of open access, as arXiv shows. On the other hand, the model of arXiv is very different from open access biological collections such as PubMed Central or open access publishers like PLoS-- physicists submit things to arXiv *before* submitting them to a peer reviewed journal -- in some cases, the comments received on arXiv are all the peer review a paper gets -- and yet physicists feel comfortable citing a paper on arXiv.
ReplyDeleteI realize that being peer reviewed isn't a magical guarantee of correctness, but I'm glad open access in the biological world has kept it.
I am not so sure we cannot mix and match. I think in the long run, one could have preprint servers like arXiv and also do full peer review. The preprint server would serve as a way of setting priority and communicating information early on, and then peer review would serve to say what the quality of the stuff is.
ReplyDeleteTree of Life is the spotlight blog on the fairly new UC Davis blogs page http://blogs.ucdavis.edu/ -- and, thanks to Jonathan, the blogs list is longer with more science blogs, including one from Mario Pineda-Krch, a theoretical ecologist.
ReplyDeletethx Susanne
ReplyDelete